WelcomeAbout
StaffContactEvent CalendarThe EvoS FundBooksWebsitesTutorialStart Your Own
Seminars
Fall 2007
Barbara EhrenreichJonathan HaidtHoward RachlinCarlo MaleyJeffrey CarpenterPeter TurchinJack SchultzScott Turner
Spring 2008
Anthony BiglanWilliam CreskoPatricia HawleyAndrew DeWoodyJoseph LeDouxJames NoonanBarbara FinlayGordon GallupRichard PouyatElizabeth Adkins-ReganJames MacKillop
Fall 2008
David Sloan WilsonBarbara OakleyBNP SymposiumRichard MichodMichael BellRandy OlsonWilliam RomeyChris ReiberSteven BrownBrian Boyd
Spring 2009
Dennis EmbryDavid HackerSteven PlatekSue MargulisSue Savage-RumbaughSteven NeubergHarvey WhitehouseThomas SeeleyGeorge LevineHelen Fisher
Video: "The Drive to Love and Who We Choose"
Fall 2009
Liza MoscoviceDiane M. Doran-SheehyKaren HollisPeter O. GrayChris KuzawaSteven SiegelRolf Quam
Rolf Quam 10/30/2009 EvoS Seminar Presentation
Bill JankowiakBaba BrinkmanPeter B. GrayMassimo Pigliucci
Massimo Pigliucci 12/4/2009 EvoS Seminar Presentation
Spring 2010
John GowdyDaniel LendeWilliam Harcourt-SmithTodd K. ShackelfordIain CouzinBruce HoodMelissa Emery ThompsonNancy EasterlinSteve NowickiJohn Marshall TownsendJoan Silk
Fall 2010
Josh BongardFred SmithDarryl de RuiterJay BelskyKari SegravesJulie SeamanLisa Karrer and David SimonsRick HarrisonRebecca SearTom LangenDaniel Kruger
Spring 2011
Steven C. HayesAndreas Duus PapeJessica LightMaryanne FisherGreg UrbanAndreas Koenig & Carola BorriesDaniel NettleDeane BowersCharles T. Snowdon
Fall 2011
David Sloan WilsonDavid C. LahtiRichard R. ShakerSergio AlmécijaHugo MercierLeslie C. AielloMark E. RitchieAdam LaatsLinda IvanyRalph M. GarrutoAdam Siepel
Spring 2012
John RieffelDr. Linda S. RayorDan EisenbergKevin L. PolkAndrew C. GallupKevin M. KniffinDavid DobbsNicole CameronJonathan HaidtDr. Joseph L. Graves, Jr.
Fall 2012
Barry X. KuhleCraig Eric MorrisCarin PerillouxDavid Sloan WilsonEric AlaniJesse BeringEli BridgeJaak Panksepp
Spring 2013
John TeehanRobert HolahanJenny Kao-KniffinShara BaileyHod LipsonDominic JohnsonMatthew HareCraig Eric MorrisBrooks MinerMichael RoseDavid Sloan Wilson
Fall 2013
Steven BrownNina FeffermanJohn Gowdy and Lisi KrallWarren Douglas AllmonTrenton HollidayJonathan GottschallArnab RoyDavid SchafferMichele GelfandJames SobelPatrick RoosEvoS Food Panel
Spring 2014
Daniel O’BrienBruce RobertsonRobert S. FeranecHeather FiumeraLuther H. MartinBjorn GrindeSarah RadtkeAleksey KolmogorovKathleen Sterling & Sébastien LacombeDebate! Evolutionary Psychology vs. Feminist CritiqueEducation Brown Bag
Fall 2014
Gad SaadT. Joel WadeNelson G. Hairston, Jr.Francis J. YammarinoDerek TurnerMatthew M. GervaisBernd BlosseyRolf QuamKelsey DancauseSharon Street
Spring 2015
Debra LiebermanMichael BerkmanDavid Sloan WilsonJason Munshi-SouthMa’ikwe Schaub LudwigJustin GarsonRéginald AugerDavid DaviesPatrica WrightCraig Eric MorrisMeredith E Coles
Fall 2015
Aaron J. Sams
Suggest a Speaker
Students
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduate Student AssociationSUNY Broome Transfer Course ListUndergraduate RequirementsUndergraduate Courses
Graduate Students
Graduate Student OrganizationGraduate RequirementsGraduate Courses
Others
EvoS from a DistanceNon-Matriculated Students
Faculty
Becoming InvolvedEvoS as an Institute for Advanced StudiesLeslie HeywoodCo-hosting
Projects
Early Childhood Education WorkshopInsect SamplingEvoS Lifestyle Project"What's New in EvoS" Podcast
Alumni Corner
Andrew C. GallupLiza R. MoscoviceJustin R. GarciaJennifer Campbell-SmithMichael L MillerCraig Eric MorrisDaniel Weinstein
 

Julie Seaman

Emory University School of Law

Evolved Sex Differences and the Law of Sex Discrimination: A Conversation?

Monday, November 1, 2010
Lecture Hall 2, 5:00 PM

Abstract

Equality under the law and non-discrimination are bedrock principles of the contemporary United States legal landscape, embedded in our constitutional jurisprudence and federal and state antidiscrimination statutes. Yet government and private actors routinely treat individuals and groups differently from one another based on one or another characteristic deemed relevant in the particular context. Certain characteristics – such as race – are held to be especially suspect and are presumptively out-of-bounds as a basis of different treatment by government, employers, and others covered by antidiscrimination laws. However, when the characteristic in question is an individual’s sex, determinations of equality and discrimination are especially problematic. Courts and scholars have long struggled over the existence, relevance, and appropriate treatment of differences between males and females.

In this presentation, I will suggest that the findings of evolutionary science may offer some guidance through the thickets of sex and gender, sameness and difference, invidious and benign discrimination as confronted by legislators, courts, and legal scholars. Though it is crucial to be mindful of the checkered – indeed often sordid and horrific – history of biological explanations of human difference, there is much insight to be gained from a careful and critical examination of the evolutionary tides that have shaped human behavior and given rise to certain sex-based differences. Because the law operates not in an ideal, imagined world but in an actual world peopled by humans with bodies and behaviors shaped by evolutionary forces, it makes sense to attempt to understand these forces and their relevance to law. Sex discrimination law in particular, in its concern with issues of sex, gender, work, harassment, status, stereotype, and difference, presents an ideal context in which to begin to address some of these questions.

Biography

Julie Seaman is an associate professor of law at Emory University, where she teaches courses on evidence, constitutional law, and hate speech. Though she has no formal training in evolutionary biology or evolutionary psychology, she became intrigued with these subjects several years ago when she happened upon an article that used evolutionary theory to argue that laws against sex discrimination in the workplace were misguided. Though initially of the view that evolution and law had nothing to say to one another, the more she delved into the evolutionary literature, the more she became convinced that evolution in fact might have much to tell law, particularly in the context of sex, gender, and discrimination.

In addition to her work in the area of law and evolution, Professor Seaman’s research interests include various issues at the intersection of law and neuroscience, as well as the impact more generally of advances in science, including cognitive and social neuroscience, upon settled legal doctrines and theories.

Available Readings

Professor Seaman’s articles may be downloaded here.

Presentation Video:

Podcast Interview:

Conversation with Julie

Poster (PDF):