WelcomeAbout
StaffContactEvent CalendarThe EvoS FundBooksWebsitesTutorialStart Your Own
Seminars
Fall 2007
Barbara EhrenreichJonathan HaidtHoward RachlinCarlo MaleyJeffrey CarpenterPeter TurchinJack SchultzScott Turner
Spring 2008
Anthony BiglanWilliam CreskoPatricia HawleyAndrew DeWoodyJoseph LeDouxJames NoonanBarbara FinlayGordon GallupRichard PouyatElizabeth Adkins-ReganJames MacKillop
Fall 2008
David Sloan WilsonBarbara OakleyBNP SymposiumRichard MichodMichael BellRandy OlsonWilliam RomeyChris ReiberSteven BrownBrian Boyd
Spring 2009
Dennis EmbryDavid HackerSteven PlatekSue MargulisSue Savage-RumbaughSteven NeubergHarvey WhitehouseThomas SeeleyGeorge LevineHelen Fisher
Video: "The Drive to Love and Who We Choose"
Fall 2009
Liza MoscoviceDiane M. Doran-SheehyKaren HollisPeter O. GrayChris KuzawaSteven SiegelRolf Quam
Rolf Quam 10/30/2009 EvoS Seminar Presentation
Bill JankowiakBaba BrinkmanPeter B. GrayMassimo Pigliucci
Massimo Pigliucci 12/4/2009 EvoS Seminar Presentation
Spring 2010
John GowdyDaniel LendeWilliam Harcourt-SmithTodd K. ShackelfordIain CouzinBruce HoodMelissa Emery ThompsonNancy EasterlinSteve NowickiJohn Marshall TownsendJoan Silk
Fall 2010
Josh BongardFred SmithDarryl de RuiterJay BelskyKari SegravesJulie SeamanLisa Karrer and David SimonsRick HarrisonRebecca SearTom LangenDaniel Kruger
Spring 2011
Steven C. HayesAndreas Duus PapeJessica LightMaryanne FisherGreg UrbanAndreas Koenig & Carola BorriesDaniel NettleDeane BowersCharles T. Snowdon
Fall 2011
David Sloan WilsonDavid C. LahtiRichard R. ShakerSergio AlmécijaHugo MercierLeslie C. AielloMark E. RitchieAdam LaatsLinda IvanyRalph M. GarrutoAdam Siepel
Spring 2012
John RieffelDr. Linda S. RayorDan EisenbergKevin L. PolkAndrew C. GallupKevin M. KniffinDavid DobbsNicole CameronJonathan HaidtDr. Joseph L. Graves, Jr.
Fall 2012
Barry X. KuhleCraig Eric MorrisCarin PerillouxDavid Sloan WilsonEric AlaniJesse BeringEli BridgeJaak Panksepp
Spring 2013
John TeehanRobert HolahanJenny Kao-KniffinShara BaileyHod LipsonDominic JohnsonMatthew HareCraig Eric MorrisBrooks MinerMichael RoseDavid Sloan Wilson
Fall 2013
Steven BrownNina FeffermanJohn Gowdy and Lisi KrallWarren Douglas AllmonTrenton HollidayJonathan GottschallArnab RoyDavid SchafferMichele GelfandJames SobelPatrick RoosEvoS Food Panel
Spring 2014
Daniel O’BrienBruce RobertsonRobert S. FeranecHeather FiumeraLuther H. MartinBjorn GrindeSarah RadtkeAleksey KolmogorovKathleen Sterling & Sébastien LacombeDebate! Evolutionary Psychology vs. Feminist CritiqueEducation Brown Bag
Fall 2014
Gad SaadT. Joel WadeNelson G. Hairston, Jr.Francis J. YammarinoDerek TurnerMatthew M. GervaisBernd BlosseyRolf QuamKelsey DancauseSharon Street
Spring 2015
Debra LiebermanMichael BerkmanDavid Sloan WilsonJason Munshi-SouthMa’ikwe Schaub LudwigJustin GarsonRéginald AugerDavid DaviesPatrica WrightCraig Eric MorrisMeredith E Coles
Fall 2015
Aaron J. Sams
Suggest a Speaker
Students
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduate Student AssociationSUNY Broome Transfer Course ListUndergraduate RequirementsUndergraduate Courses
Graduate Students
Graduate Student OrganizationGraduate RequirementsGraduate Courses
Others
EvoS from a DistanceNon-Matriculated Students
Faculty
Becoming InvolvedEvoS as an Institute for Advanced StudiesLeslie HeywoodCo-hosting
Projects
Early Childhood Education WorkshopInsect SamplingEvoS Lifestyle Project"What's New in EvoS" Podcast
Alumni Corner
Andrew C. GallupLiza R. MoscoviceJustin R. GarciaJennifer Campbell-SmithMichael L MillerCraig Eric MorrisDaniel Weinstein
 

William Cresko

Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Oregon

The genetic basis of parallel evolution in threespine stickleback

February 8, 2008
Engineering Building 110, 4:00 PM

Abstract

A fundamental problem in evolutionary biology is understanding the developmental genetic basis of evolving traits in natural populations. Over most of the 150 years since Darwin outlined the fundamentals of evolution by natural selection, biologists have had little data on how many genes contribute to evolving traits, what the distribution of allelic effects are across genes, and precisely how alleles interact to generate evolving phenotypes. Due in large part to the recent re-synthesis of evolution and developmental studies (evodevo), a number of these questions are now beginning to be answered. Our laboratory has been contributing to this field by developing the threespine stickleback into a model for evodevo studies. I will describe our progress in understanding the genetic and developmental basis of bony armor loss in Alaskan stickleback, as well as our more recent work on understanding the evolution of head and jaw (craniofacial) morphology. I will also briefly describe our developmental and genomic advances that make the functional dissection of evolving stickleback characters possible. The long term goal of our research is to discover how alleles of genes segregating in natural populations affect cell behaviors and tissue organization, and then use this functional knowledge to better understand the generation and evolution of ecologically relevant phenotypes in the wild. We have just started this journey with stickleback, but our initial findings are already providing surprising insights into age-old evolutionary questions.

Noon Talk

A defining feature of life is genetic and phenotypic complexity, which must arise through the accretion of information in the genomes of lineages. But how does this accretion occur, and how is this process related to the generation of phenotypic diversity? Recent work on gene and genome duplication, as well as discoveries in the logic of genetic regulation, are starting to shed light on these questions. Our lab has been tackling this problem on two fronts. First we are exploring the fate of duplicate genes in the stickleback lineage in comparison and other ray fin fish lineages. Teleosts share a whole genome duplication that occurred in a common ancestor at the base of the radiation, and they are also the most diverse group of vertebrates both in terms of numbers of species and amount of phenotypic diversity. Are these related, and if so how? I will discuss our findings and (tentative) conclusions. In addition to our empirical work, we are taking theoretical modeling approaches to understand the origin, accretion and dissemination of genetic modularity. I will present our most recent findings, and discuss how our work, in conjunction with research in many other laboratories, is beginning to address thorny problems in evolution such as the origins of organismal complexity.

Biography

Bill Cresko grew up in Tunkhannock, PA, just south of Binghamton. Bill became enamored with aquatic systems during high school field trips to wetlands along the Atlantic coast, and decided to attend the University of Pennsylvania where he majored in biology with an emphasis on ecology. His undergrad research was on the population dynamics of diamondback terrapins in the Chesapeake Bay, and led to his first publication in the journal Conservation Biology. At the same time, Bill took several excellent evolutionary courses, including two taught by Neil Shubin, that were evodevo oriented when the field was just developing. He was hooked, and decided to study evodevo problems using an aquatic system during graduate school. Bill found the work of Dr. Susan Foster on geographic variation in threespine stickleback in Alaska, and knew that with this rapidly evolving fish, living in both marine and freshwater habitats, that he had found an ideal system. Bill joined Susan’s laboratory at Clark University and established a project examining the population and quantitative genetics of divergence along a benthic-limnetic phenotypic axis, and this work was supported by a fellowship from the EPA. Bill then decided to learn much more about the developmental genetic basis of evolving traits, and began postdoctoral work in two zebrafish laboratories at the University of Oregon that was funded by an NIH fellowship. John Postlethwait and Chuck Kimmel both enthusiastically encouraged him to pursue evodevo work on his Alaskan stickleback system. Bill made good immediate progress, with surprising discoveries about the genetic basis of parallel loss of stickleback armor. Bill decided that Oregon was an ideal place to continue his research, and he opened his own laboratory in the Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (CEEB) in the fall of 2005. During his tenure in Oregon, has been fortunate to have his work supported by grants from NSF and NIH. Bill’s little growing family of stickleback researchers are having great fun developing the stickleback system, and his lab has also branched out into exciting new areas such as understanding how the genomes of pipefish and seahorses, close relatives of stickleback, have been modified to form very different morphologies.

Readings

  1. The origin of subfunctions and modular gene regulation
  2. Genome duplication, subfunction, partitioning, and linear divergence: Sox9 in stickleback and zebrafish
  3. Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations

Tags: ,

Spring 2008 Seminar Series Icon